Racial profiling in NJ and NY Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Racial profiling in NJ and NY - Essay Example The allegations on racial profiling continue to provoke debate and partition among members of the communities. Many states have encountered more civil action lawsuits as a consequence of racial profiling allegations. This kind of proceedings is not only costly and time consuming but disruptive to the community and department it serves. Racial profiling is commonly defined as the use of race and used as the â€Å"only† basis for a stop. It is also the exercise of detaining a suspect according to a broad set of criteria which, casts suspicion on the complete class of people lacking of any personal suspicion of the specific person being stopped (Leach, 2001). Durlauf (2005, p 30-31) conducted an assessment on racial profiling and concluded that upon assessment by deontological arguments and/or welfarist, it was known that in traffic stops and searches, general case in support of racial profiling is very weak. The welfarist argument, that reduction of crime rates as far as racial profiling is concerned, has not been proven empirically; studies of race and guilt rates do not identify the prevention effects from the policies. The investigation will explore on the barriers to the citizen complaint system against racial profiling and its corresponding economic costs in Metropolitan Areas of New York and New Jersey. Furthermore, it should provide answers to the following questions: In October 2000 (Leach, 2004), Senator Gormley, announced that the review of racial profiling shall be conducted. The said Committees examined several issues like organizational and cultural issues confronting the Department of Law & Public Safety as well as the NJSP Part of this proposed reform is motivated by the fact, in which CAD or Computer Aided Dispatch System, the RMS or Records Management System as well as the MAPPS or Management Awareness Personnel Performance System (MAPPS) In addition, Durlauf (2001) stated that there is no good justification to believe